Thangamani vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Alwarkurichi PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 892/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010014422026
Filing Number
1144/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
892/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
68
Police Station
Alwarkuruchi P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thangamani
Adv. Tr.S. BALA SANKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Alwarkurichi PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court modified the bail conditions imposed on accused Thangamani in the earlier order. Originally required to report daily at Madurai Thallakulam P.S., the court changed the reporting station to Tirunelveli Town P.S. at 10:00 A.M., effective March 25, 2026, considering his role as family breadwinner supporting aged parents. The Public Prosecutor conceded to the modification after the accused demonstrated 12 days of compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 892/2026
The court modified the bail conditions imposed on accused Thangamani in the earlier order. Originally required to report daily at Madurai Thallakulam P.S., the court changed the reporting station to Tirunelveli Town P.S. at 10:00 A.M., effective March 25, 2026, considering his role as family breadwinner supporting aged parents. The Public Prosecutor conceded to the modification after the accused demonstrated 12 days of compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts