Karthi vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 820/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010013492026

Filing Number

1073/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

820/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

Senthamaram P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karthi

    Adv. C. THANGARAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Karthi, accused of theft of a two-wheeler worth Rs. 20,000 under BNS sections 331(4) and 305(a). The court considered that he had been incarcerated for 23 days, the stolen property was recovered, the co-accused was already granted bail, and his criminal antecedents were minimal. Bail was granted on executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily police reporting for one month, availability for interrogation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 820/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Karthi, accused of theft of a two-wheeler worth Rs. 20,000 under BNS sections 331(4) and 305(a). The court considered that he had been incarcerated for 23 days, the stolen property was recovered, the co-accused was already granted bail, and his criminal antecedents were minimal. Bail was granted on executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily police reporting for one month, availability for interrogation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case