Karthi vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 820/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010013492026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1073/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
820/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
Senthamaram P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karthi
Adv. C. THANGARAJ
Respondent(s)
Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Karthi, accused of theft of a two-wheeler worth Rs. 20,000 under BNS sections 331(4) and 305(a). The court considered that he had been incarcerated for 23 days, the stolen property was recovered, the co-accused was already granted bail, and his criminal antecedents were minimal. Bail was granted on executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily police reporting for one month, availability for interrogation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Karthi, accused of theft of a two-wheeler worth Rs. 20,000 under BNS sections 331(4) and 305(a). The court considered that he had been incarcerated for 23 days, the stolen property was recovered, the co-accused was already granted bail, and his criminal antecedents were minimal. Bail was granted on executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily police reporting for one month, availability for interrogation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts