Ahamed Noordeen vs Inspector of Police, Achanputhur — 817/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010013482026

Filing Number

1072/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

817/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

Atchampudur P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ahamed Noordeen

    Adv. K.Nithyanandham

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Achanputhur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, dismissed bail petitions filed by two accused (A2 and A3) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 109(1), and 351(3) for allegedly attacking a complainant with a sickle causing grievous injuries on the vital shoulder area. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the offense, pending investigation, injury to vital body parts, strong prosecution objection, and the accused's antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 817/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, dismissed bail petitions filed by two accused (A2 and A3) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 109(1), and 351(3) for allegedly attacking a complainant with a sickle causing grievous injuries on the vital shoulder area. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the offense, pending investigation, injury to vital body parts, strong prosecution objection, and the accused's antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case