UDAYAR vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Sankarankovil Town PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 822/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010013452026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

1070/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

822/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

83

Police Station

Sankarankoil Town P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UDAYAR

    Adv. MORRIS MOHAMED THAREEK M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Sankarankovil Town PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Udayar under Section 482 BNSS. The petitioner was accused of offences under Section 296(b), 351(3) of BNS and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act arising from a neighborhood dispute involving a group clash between Gandhi Nagar and Kamarajar Nagar residents that caused damage to a motorcycle. Despite acknowledging that no injury was sustained and the petitioner had no prior criminal record, the court found the serious nature of the group clash and property damage sufficient to refuse anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 822/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Udayar under Section 482 BNSS. The petitioner was accused of offences under Section 296(b), 351(3) of BNS and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act arising from a neighborhood dispute involving a group clash between Gandhi Nagar and Kamarajar Nagar residents that caused damage to a motorcycle. Despite acknowledging that no injury was sustained and the petitioner had no prior criminal record, the court found the serious nature of the group clash and property damage sufficient to refuse anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case