UDAYAR vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Sankarankovil Town PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 822/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010013452026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
1070/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
822/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
83
Police Station
Sankarankoil Town P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UDAYAR
Adv. MORRIS MOHAMED THAREEK M
Respondent(s)
Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Sankarankovil Town PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Udayar under Section 482 BNSS. The petitioner was accused of offences under Section 296(b), 351(3) of BNS and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act arising from a neighborhood dispute involving a group clash between Gandhi Nagar and Kamarajar Nagar residents that caused damage to a motorcycle. Despite acknowledging that no injury was sustained and the petitioner had no prior criminal record, the court found the serious nature of the group clash and property damage sufficient to refuse anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Udayar under Section 482 BNSS. The petitioner was accused of offences under Section 296(b), 351(3) of BNS and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act arising from a neighborhood dispute involving a group clash between Gandhi Nagar and Kamarajar Nagar residents that caused damage to a motorcycle. Despite acknowledging that no injury was sustained and the petitioner had no prior criminal record, the court found the serious nature of the group clash and property damage sufficient to refuse anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts