Suvisesa Raj vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Alangulam PEW PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 828/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010013352026

Filing Number

1060/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

828/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suvisesa Raj

    Adv. Tr.D. Pugalventhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Alangulam PEW PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed Suvishesha Raj's bail petition (Cr.M.P. 828/2026) filed under Section 483 BNSS. The accused was arrested on 12.01.2026 for offenses under IPC sections 468, 471, 473, 34 and TNP Act sections 4(1)(Aaa), 4(1A), after a Non-Bailable Warrant was issued on 08.12.2025 due to his non-appearance. The court rejected the bail plea considering that the accused had jumped bail, his non-appearance was hampering case proceedings, and there was a substantial risk of absconding and re-offending if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 828/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed Suvishesha Raj's bail petition (Cr.M.P. 828/2026) filed under Section 483 BNSS. The accused was arrested on 12.01.2026 for offenses under IPC sections 468, 471, 473, 34 and TNP Act sections 4(1)(Aaa), 4(1A), after a Non-Bailable Warrant was issued on 08.12.2025 due to his non-appearance. The court rejected the bail plea considering that the accused had jumped bail, his non-appearance was hampering case proceedings, and there was a substantial risk of absconding and re-offending if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case