Harihara Sudhan vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Tenkasi PS — 797/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010013002026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1034/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
797/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
2-Additional District Session Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Harihara Sudhan
Respondent(s)
Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Tenkasi PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Session Judge
Disposed
Orders
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Harihara Sudhan (Accused No. 3), who had been in judicial custody for ten months in a murder case involving revenge-related offenses under BNS 2023 sections 103(2), 296(b), 351(3), and 61(2). The court found that despite prosecution concerns about witness tampering and flight risk, the extended incarceration period and early case stage warranted bail, subject to conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting, and restrictions against evidence tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Harihara Sudhan (Accused No. 3), who had been in judicial custody for ten months in a murder case involving revenge-related offenses under BNS 2023 sections 103(2), 296(b), 351(3), and 61(2). The court found that despite prosecution concerns about witness tampering and flight risk, the extended incarceration period and early case stage warranted bail, subject to conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting, and restrictions against evidence tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts