Manikkam vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, K.V.Nallur PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 792/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012972026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

1031/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

792/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

Karivalamvanthanallur P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manikkam

    Adv. K Thangadurai

  2. 2.Kanagaraj

    Adv. K Thangadurai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, K.V.Nallur PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Manikkam and Kanagaraj under Section 482 BNSS. The court found that the accused assaulted a police constable on duty at a temple, causing injuries including loss of teeth, and prevented him from discharging official duties, which constituted serious offenses warranting denial of bail despite the injury being minor and no prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Manikkam and Kanagaraj under Section 482 BNSS. The court found that the accused assaulted a police constable on duty at a temple, causing injuries including loss of teeth, and prevented him from discharging official duties, which constituted serious offenses warranting denial of bail despite the injury being minor and no prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case