Rashmi vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Puliyangudi PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 794/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012962026

Filing Number

1030/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

794/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

Puliyankudi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rashmi

    Adv. Thiru.M.Leyon

  2. 2.Muthupandi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Puliyangudi PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi modified the bail conditions imposed on accused Rashmi and Muthupandi, allowing them to report and sign at Tirunelveli Town P.S. daily at 5:00 P.M. instead of at Puliyangudi P.S., effective from March 11, 2026. The court granted this modification since Rashmi works at a Primary Health Centre in Tirunelveli and could not comply with daily reporting at the original police station, while the Public Prosecutor conceded to the modification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 794/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi modified the bail conditions imposed on accused Rashmi and Muthupandi, allowing them to report and sign at Tirunelveli Town P.S. daily at 5:00 P.M. instead of at Puliyangudi P.S., effective from March 11, 2026. The court granted this modification since Rashmi works at a Primary Health Centre in Tirunelveli and could not comply with daily reporting at the original police station, while the Public Prosecutor conceded to the modification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case