Karthik durai vs Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Vasudevanallur PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 793/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010012932026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
1029/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
793/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
76
Police Station
Vasudevanallur
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karthik durai
Adv. MOHAMED SAIT D
Respondent(s)
-
1.Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Vasudevanallur PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted anticipatory bail to Karthik Durai for alleged offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 324(4), and 351(3), considering that the injured party was discharged from hospital, the petitioner has no prior criminal record, and the dispute appeared primarily civil in nature. The bail was granted subject to stringent conditions including executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to police for one month, depositing Rs.10,000 as criminal security, furnishing contact details, cooperating with investigation, and not tampering with witnesses or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 793/2026
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted anticipatory bail to Karthik Durai for alleged offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 324(4), and 351(3), considering that the injured party was discharged from hospital, the petitioner has no prior criminal record, and the dispute appeared primarily civil in nature. The bail was granted subject to stringent conditions including executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to police for one month, depositing Rs.10,000 as criminal security, furnishing contact details, cooperating with investigation, and not tampering with witnesses or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts