Eswaran vs Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Kadayanallur PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 791/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012922026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

1028/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

791/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

Kadayanallur P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Eswaran

    Adv. Chinthamani M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Kadayanallur PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed Eswaran's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS for alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 311, and 351(3) of BNS (armed robbery and assault). Although no specific overt act was attributed to the petitioner, the court denied bail because stolen properties were not recovered, this was a second petition with no changed circumstances, and the investigation remained pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 791/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Eswaran's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS for alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 311, and 351(3) of BNS (armed robbery and assault). Although no specific overt act was attributed to the petitioner, the court denied bail because stolen properties were not recovered, this was a second petition with no changed circumstances, and the investigation remained pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case