Saravanan vs Police Department rep by SHO, Cyber Crime Tenkasi Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 788/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012892026

Filing Number

1025/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

788/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

Cyber Crime - TENKASI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saravanan

    Adv. Thiru.M.Elayaraja

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by SHO (Station House Officer), Cyber Crime Tenkasi Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Tenkasi Sessions Court dismissed Saravanan's bail petition in a cyber fraud case involving online cheating and pyramid-style money transfers across India. Despite the petitioner having completed 28 days in custody on his second bail application, the court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the petitioner's status as the prime accused (A1), ongoing investigation requiring his interrogation, and his detention under the Goondas Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 788/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Tenkasi Sessions Court dismissed Saravanan's bail petition in a cyber fraud case involving online cheating and pyramid-style money transfers across India. Despite the petitioner having completed 28 days in custody on his second bail application, the court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the petitioner's status as the prime accused (A1), ongoing investigation requiring his interrogation, and his detention under the Goondas Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case