Suresh vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Surandai PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 784/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012812026

Filing Number

1018/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

784/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

Surandai P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh

    Adv. Alagu Kasi Eswaran M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Surandai PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted the petitioner Suresh's petition to relax bail conditions imposed in an earlier anticipatory bail order. The court allowed the relaxation of the daily police reporting requirement (at 10:00 A.M. for one month), considering the petitioner's compliance for 11 days and his spinal cord disease condition. The petitioner must now appear before the court on all hearing dates without fail, with other conditions remaining unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 784/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted the petitioner Suresh's petition to relax bail conditions imposed in an earlier anticipatory bail order. The court allowed the relaxation of the daily police reporting requirement (at 10:00 A.M. for one month), considering the petitioner's compliance for 11 days and his spinal cord disease condition. The petitioner must now appear before the court on all hearing dates without fail, with other conditions remaining unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case