Kottaithai vs Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Surandai PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 765/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012472026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

993/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

765/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kottaithai

    Adv. KAYALVIZHI

  2. 2.Rasa

    Adv. KAYALVIZHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Surandai PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Tenkasi Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners (Kottaithai and Rasa) accused under BNS Sections 296(b), 115(2) and TNPHW Act Section 4, arising from a matrimonial dispute case. The court found that the victim was discharged from hospital, the main accused was already released on bail, petitioners had no prior criminal history, and the petitioners are in-laws with no direct involvement, warranting bail subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 765/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Tenkasi Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners (Kottaithai and Rasa) accused under BNS Sections 296(b), 115(2) and TNPHW Act Section 4, arising from a matrimonial dispute case. The court found that the victim was discharged from hospital, the main accused was already released on bail, petitioners had no prior criminal history, and the petitioners are in-laws with no direct involvement, warranting bail subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case