Seenipandi vs Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Kuruvikualm PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 766/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012452026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

992/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

766/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Seenipandi

    Adv. MOHAMED SAIT D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Kuruvikualm PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted anticipatory bail to Seenipandi under Section 482 BNSS for alleged offences of criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt with a sickle, arising from a property dispute with a relative. The court's decision was based on the victim's discharge from hospital, the petitioner's clean criminal record, the counter-case filed by the petitioner, and the reciprocal nature of the dispute. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting at the police station for one month, availability for interrogation, and prohibition against tampering with witnesses or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 766/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted anticipatory bail to Seenipandi under Section 482 BNSS for alleged offences of criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt with a sickle, arising from a property dispute with a relative. The court's decision was based on the victim's discharge from hospital, the petitioner's clean criminal record, the counter-case filed by the petitioner, and the reciprocal nature of the dispute. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting at the police station for one month, availability for interrogation, and prohibition against tampering with witnesses or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case