Murugan vs Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Thiruvengadam PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 756/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010012442026
Filing Number
991/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
756/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Murugan
Adv. Tr.E.Appadurai
Respondent(s)
Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Thiruvengadam PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 07-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 05-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Murugan, accused of possessing 900 grams of prohibited tobacco products under Section 123 BNS and Section 24(1) CAOTP Act. The court considered his clean criminal record, health issues (lung treatment), 8 days of incarceration, and the bailable nature of the offense under CAOTP Act Section 27. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, Rs.1,000 payment to Chief Minister's Relief Fund, and non-tampering of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Murugan, accused of possessing 900 grams of prohibited tobacco products under Section 123 BNS and Section 24(1) CAOTP Act. The court considered his clean criminal record, health issues (lung treatment), 8 days of incarceration, and the bailable nature of the offense under CAOTP Act Section 27. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, Rs.1,000 payment to Chief Minister's Relief Fund, and non-tampering of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts