Murugan vs Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Thiruvengadam PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 756/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012442026

Filing Number

991/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

756/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugan

    Adv. Tr.E.Appadurai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Thiruvengadam PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Murugan, accused of possessing 900 grams of prohibited tobacco products under Section 123 BNS and Section 24(1) CAOTP Act. The court considered his clean criminal record, health issues (lung treatment), 8 days of incarceration, and the bailable nature of the offense under CAOTP Act Section 27. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, Rs.1,000 payment to Chief Minister's Relief Fund, and non-tampering of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 756/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Murugan, accused of possessing 900 grams of prohibited tobacco products under Section 123 BNS and Section 24(1) CAOTP Act. The court considered his clean criminal record, health issues (lung treatment), 8 days of incarceration, and the bailable nature of the offense under CAOTP Act Section 27. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, Rs.1,000 payment to Chief Minister's Relief Fund, and non-tampering of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case