Pandi vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 755/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012412026

Filing Number

990/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

755/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pandi

    Adv. Thiru.S.Pasumpon Selvakumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Tenkasi Sessions Court dismissed the bail petition of Pandi (accused A2), who was arrested for forging insurance policies under IPC sections 465, 468, 469, and 420. The court found credible evidence that the accused, acting as an insurance agent, fabricated fake motor insurance policies and defrauded HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company. Rejecting bail despite 39 days of incarceration and a prior High Court dismissal, the court determined that custodial interrogation remained necessary for the ongoing investigation, considering the gravity of the offense and the accused's criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 755/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Tenkasi Sessions Court dismissed the bail petition of Pandi (accused A2), who was arrested for forging insurance policies under IPC sections 465, 468, 469, and 420. The court found credible evidence that the accused, acting as an insurance agent, fabricated fake motor insurance policies and defrauded HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company. Rejecting bail despite 39 days of incarceration and a prior High Court dismissal, the court determined that custodial interrogation remained necessary for the ongoing investigation, considering the gravity of the offense and the accused's criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case