Pandi vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 758/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012402026

Filing Number

989/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

758/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pandi

    Adv. Thiru.S.Pasumpon Selvakumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, dismissed Pandi's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving forged motor insurance policy fraud against HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company. The court found sufficient grounds to deny bail, citing the serious nature of the offences (IPC sections 465, 468, 469, 420), ongoing investigation, petitioner's prior criminal history, a dismissed High Court petition on similar grounds, and necessity for custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 758/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, dismissed Pandi's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving forged motor insurance policy fraud against HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company. The court found sufficient grounds to deny bail, citing the serious nature of the offences (IPC sections 465, 468, 469, 420), ongoing investigation, petitioner's prior criminal history, a dismissed High Court petition on similar grounds, and necessity for custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case