Kottursamy vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Ilathur PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 752/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012342026

Filing Number

983/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

752/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kottursamy

    Adv. S.Ganesan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Ilathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Kottursamy (accused A1) in a case involving alleged offenses under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(2), and 351(3) arising from a quarrel that resulted in assault with a sickle. The court allowed the bail petition considering that the injured party was discharged from hospital, the petitioner had already undergone 7 days of incarceration, subject to conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to police for one month, and restrictions on witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 752/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Kottursamy (accused A1) in a case involving alleged offenses under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(2), and 351(3) arising from a quarrel that resulted in assault with a sickle. The court allowed the bail petition considering that the injured party was discharged from hospital, the petitioner had already undergone 7 days of incarceration, subject to conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to police for one month, and restrictions on witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case