Mareesh vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 763/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012242026

Filing Number

977/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

763/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mareesh

    Adv. Thiru.G.Murugesan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Senthamaram PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Mareesh, accused of cheating a complainant by mortgaging a gold-covering chain instead of a gold chain for Rs. 3,80,000, considering his clean criminal record, 29 days of incarceration, and this being his second bail petition. The bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including daily police reporting for one month, availability for interrogation, and non-tampering with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 763/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Mareesh, accused of cheating a complainant by mortgaging a gold-covering chain instead of a gold chain for Rs. 3,80,000, considering his clean criminal record, 29 days of incarceration, and this being his second bail petition. The bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including daily police reporting for one month, availability for interrogation, and non-tampering with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case