Murugan vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Pavoorchatram PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 761/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012232026

Filing Number

976/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

761/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugan

    Adv. N. GOKUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Pavoorchatram PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, granted bail to Murugan, who was arrested for possession of prohibited tobacco products under Section 123 of BNS and Section 24(1) of CAOTP Act. The court found that the offense is bailable, the petitioner had no prior criminal record, and had already spent 13 days in custody, warranting bail with conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, daily reporting for one month, and a Rs.2,000 contribution to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 761/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, granted bail to Murugan, who was arrested for possession of prohibited tobacco products under Section 123 of BNS and Section 24(1) of CAOTP Act. The court found that the offense is bailable, the petitioner had no prior criminal record, and had already spent 13 days in custody, warranting bail with conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, daily reporting for one month, and a Rs.2,000 contribution to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case