Jothi vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Pavoorchatram PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 762/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010012212026

Filing Number

974/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

762/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jothi

    Adv. Thiru.M.Elayaraja

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Pavoorchatram PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the bail petition of Jothi under Section 483 BNSS. The accused was arrested for alleged offences under Section 311 BNS involving a criminal intimidation case where 7 accused persons allegedly lured the victim through Loconto App and robbed Rs. 3,000. The court denied bail considering the pending investigation, nature of the offence, the accused's antecedents, and the prosecution's strong objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 762/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the bail petition of Jothi under Section 483 BNSS. The accused was arrested for alleged offences under Section 311 BNS involving a criminal intimidation case where 7 accused persons allegedly lured the victim through Loconto App and robbed Rs. 3,000. The court denied bail considering the pending investigation, nature of the offence, the accused's antecedents, and the prosecution's strong objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case