MANIKANDASELVAM vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, V.K.Pudhur PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 717/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010011862026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

948/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

717/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANIKANDASELVAM

    Adv. MAHENDIRAN N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, V.K.Pudhur PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Manikanda Selvam (A2) in a case involving alleged violent assault with a sickle stemming from a property dispute. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 58 days, no one sustained injury, co-accused were already released on bail, and investigation was likely complete, outweighing prosecution concerns about his criminal history. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering of witnesses, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 717/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Manikanda Selvam (A2) in a case involving alleged violent assault with a sickle stemming from a property dispute. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 58 days, no one sustained injury, co-accused were already released on bail, and investigation was likely complete, outweighing prosecution concerns about his criminal history. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering of witnesses, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case