Ganesan vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Thiruvengadam PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 723/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010011852026

e-Filing Number

01-03-2026

Filing Number

947/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

723/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganesan

    Adv. Thangaraj C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Thiruvengadam PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (A.3, A.4, A.5) in a case involving illegal possession of explosive substances without valid permits under Section 288 BNS and the Explosive Act. The bail was approved because the petitioners have no previous criminal record and co-accused were already released on bail, subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 723/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (A.3, A.4, A.5) in a case involving illegal possession of explosive substances without valid permits under Section 288 BNS and the Explosive Act. The bail was approved because the petitioners have no previous criminal record and co-accused were already released on bail, subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case