Anandhakumar vs Police Department rep by Inspector of Cyber Crime Tenkasi PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 720/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010011722026
Filing Number
936/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
720/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anandhakumar
Adv. Thiru.M.Sudalaikani
Respondent(s)
-
1.Police Department rep by Inspector of Cyber Crime Tenkasi PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to accused Anandhakumar in a cyber fraud case involving alleged online trading scam where the victim lost Rs. 97,79,419. The court found that no custodial interrogation was necessary after 40 days of incarceration with no other arrests, and allowed the bail with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 720/2026
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to accused Anandhakumar in a cyber fraud case involving alleged online trading scam where the victim lost Rs. 97,79,419. The court found that no custodial interrogation was necessary after 40 days of incarceration with no other arrests, and allowed the bail with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts