Selvaraj vs Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Alangulam PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 734/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010011642026

Filing Number

928/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

734/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvaraj

    Adv. Bhuvanesh Pon Balakumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Sub Inspector of police, Alangulam PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Tenkasi Sessions Court modified the anticipatory bail conditions imposed on accused Selvaraj, allowing him to report daily at Alangulam Police Station at 10:00 A.M. instead of Thallakulam P.S., effective March 6, 2026. The modification was granted because the petitioner's employment at TASMC Alangulam made daily travel to Thallakulam impractical, and the Public Prosecutor did not oppose the reasonable request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 734/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Tenkasi Sessions Court modified the anticipatory bail conditions imposed on accused Selvaraj, allowing him to report daily at Alangulam Police Station at 10:00 A.M. instead of Thallakulam P.S., effective March 6, 2026. The modification was granted because the petitioner's employment at TASMC Alangulam made daily travel to Thallakulam impractical, and the Public Prosecutor did not oppose the reasonable request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case