Murugesan vs Police Department the Inspector of Police, — 704/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010011452026

Filing Number

911/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

704/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugesan

    Adv. K.Siva Sakthi Velu

  2. 2.Kani Selvam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department the Inspector of Police,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the bail petition of Murugesan and Kani Selvam, who were arrested for possession of 90 grams of prohibited cannabis and alleged Arms Act violations. The court denied bail considering their status as history-sheeted rowdy elements with multiple prior convictions including SC/ST Atrocities Act cases, ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's strong objections, despite their 13 days of incarceration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 704/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the bail petition of Murugesan and Kani Selvam, who were arrested for possession of 90 grams of prohibited cannabis and alleged Arms Act violations. The court denied bail considering their status as history-sheeted rowdy elements with multiple prior convictions including SC/ST Atrocities Act cases, ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's strong objections, despite their 13 days of incarceration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case