Vinith vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Panavadalichatram PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 7/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition

CNR: TNTS010011322026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

900/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

7/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

Panavadalichatram P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinith

    Adv. MORRIS MOHAMED THAREEK M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Panavadalichatram PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Vinith v. Police Department (Criminal Revision Case 7/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi allowed Vinith's criminal revision petition and ordered return of his seized Yamaha two-wheeler (Reg. T.N.79 M 0011) as interim custody. The court found that keeping the vehicle parked unprotected in open conditions would cause irreparable damage and depreciation, outweighing police concerns about potential offence repetition or sale, particularly since trial commencement was unlikely in the near future. The vehicle was returned subject to stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 personal bond, ₹10,000 deposit, registration book custody, photographic documentation, and prohibition on alterations or transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vinith v. Police Department (Criminal Revision Case 7/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi allowed Vinith's criminal revision petition and ordered return of his seized Yamaha two-wheeler (Reg. T.N.79 M 0011) as interim custody. The court found that keeping the vehicle parked unprotected in open conditions would cause irreparable damage and depreciation, outweighing police concerns about potential offence repetition or sale, particularly since trial commencement was unlikely in the near future. The vehicle was returned subject to stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 personal bond, ₹10,000 deposit, registration book custody, photographic documentation, and prohibition on alterations or transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case