Minor Sethuraj through its father and guardian Vetriselvam vs Anthony Chinnappan and 2 anothers Advocate - Tr.S.P.Esakkipandi — 167/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 13th June 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTS010005402021

Filing Number

320/2021

Filing Date

20-Jul-2021

Registration No

167/2021

Registration Date

20-Jul-2021

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

2-Additional District Session Judge

Decision Date

13-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Minor Sethuraj through its father and guardian Vetriselvam

    Adv. Tr A.Murugan, M.A., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anthony Chinnappan and 2 anothers Advocate - Tr.S.P.Esakkipandi

  2. 2.Prabhakaran

    Adv. Tmt.Chandra

  3. 3.MAGMA HDI General Insurance company Ltd through its Branch Manager

    Adv. Tr.A.Nagarajan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District Session Judge

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    The court allowed the minor petitioner Sethuraj's examination-in-chief and cross-examination in this motor vehicle accident case involving insurance claims. The petitioner, aged 17 at the time of the accident and without a valid driving license, testified that he was driving his uncle's vehicle when struck by the opposite vehicle driven by the first respondent (also without valid license), causing injuries to both drivers. The court permitted the petitioner's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, insurance liability of the third respondent (MAGMA HDI Insurance), and his injury claims, while allowing cross-examination by the respondents' counsel regarding the accident details and compensation amount sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional District Session Judge

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional District Session Judge

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Session Judge

  8. 15-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Session Judge

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Session Judge

  10. 20-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Session Judge

  11. 23-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 23-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  13. 11-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  14. 16-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  15. 02-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  16. 05-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  17. 19-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  18. 05-Feb-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  20. 08-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  21. 13-Nov-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  22. 13-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  23. 04-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  24. 04-Oct-2024

    Restored

    Additional District Session Judge

  25. 04-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  26. 22-Jul-2024

    Disposed

    Additional District Session Judge

  27. 08-Jun-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  28. 28-May-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  29. 13-Mar-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  30. 12-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  31. 22-Jan-2024

    Amendment

    Additional District Session Judge

  32. 14-Dec-2023

    Amendment

    Additional District Session Judge

  33. 20-Nov-2023

    Amendment

    Additional District Session Judge

  34. 30-Oct-2023

    Steps

    Additional District Session Judge

  35. 21-Sep-2023

    Steps

    Additional District Session Judge

  36. 28-Aug-2023

    Steps

    Additional District Session Judge

  37. 07-Aug-2023

    Steps

    Additional District Session Judge

  38. 24-Jul-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Session Judge

  39. 12-Jul-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Session Judge

  40. 14-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  41. 05-Apr-2023

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  42. 01-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  43. 25-Jan-2023

    Enquiry

    Additional District Session Judge

  44. 14-Dec-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  45. 16-Nov-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  46. 27-Oct-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  47. 26-Sep-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  48. 14-Sep-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  49. 27-Jul-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  50. 26-Jun-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  51. 15-Jun-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  52. 30-Mar-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  53. 16-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  54. 24-Nov-2021

    Appearance

    Additional District Session Judge

  55. 15-Sep-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 20-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 167/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the minor petitioner Sethuraj's examination-in-chief and cross-examination in this motor vehicle accident case involving insurance claims. The petitioner, aged 17 at the time of the accident and without a valid driving license, testified that he was driving his uncle's vehicle when struck by the opposite vehicle driven by the first respondent (also without valid license), causing injuries to both drivers. The court permitted the petitioner's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, insurance liability of the third respondent (MAGMA HDI Insurance), and his injury claims, while allowing cross-examination by the respondents' counsel regarding the accident details and compensation amount sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case