Samudurai vs Inspector of Police Achanpudur P.S. — 235/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 Section 243. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010004092026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

319/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

235/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

2-Additional District Session Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 Section 243

Petitioner(s)

Samudurai

Adv. R.Appavu Rathinam

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police Achanpudur P.S.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District Session Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Orders

10-03-2026

Orders

27-02-2026

Enquiry

20-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenkasi allowed the petition filed by five accused persons under Section 243 CrPC to summon three forensic science experts (DNA, Anthropology, and Chemical experts) to testify. The court determined that examining these witnesses was necessary in the interest of justice, as the case critically depends on scientific evidence to establish the identity of the deceased victim, and the defense contends that key forensic reports do not support the prosecution's theory that the recovered head and trunk belonged to the same person. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenkasi allowed the petition filed by five accused persons under Section 243 CrPC to summon three forensic science experts (DNA, Anthropology, and Chemical experts) to testify. The court determined that examining these witnesses was necessary in the interest of justice, as the case critically depends on scientific evidence to establish the identity of the deceased victim, and the defense contends that key forensic reports do not support the prosecution's theory that the recovered head and trunk belonged to the same person. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case