Rajarajeshwari vs Venkatesh Advocate - Tr.S.Pandiarajan — 112/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7, R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS010003922024

Filing Number

76/2024

Filing Date

30-Apr-2024

Registration No

112/2024

Registration Date

30-Apr-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7, R1
Ia/3/2024 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section RajarajeshwariB.Murugan

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajarajeshwari

    Adv. Tr.P.Radha Krishnan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Venkatesh Advocate - Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  2. 2.Sudar Oli

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  3. 3.Vijayalakshmi

  4. 4.Puvaneshwari

  5. 5.Umarani

  6. 6.Kannigomathi

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  7. 7.Krishnaveni

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  8. 8.Sumathi

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  9. 9.Manisankar

  10. 10.B.Murugan

    Adv. Tr.I.Murugesan

  11. 11.Uthaman

    Adv. Tr.I.Murugesan

  12. 12.C.Karthick Kumar

  13. 13.C.Puvendran

  14. 14.1st Joint Sub Registrar

    Adv. Government Pleader

  15. 15.2st Joint Sub Registrar

    Adv. Government Pleader

  16. 16.District Registrar

    Adv. Government Pleader

  17. 17.Head of Registrar

    Adv. Government Pleader

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary In OS.No. 112/2024 at the Principal District Court, Tenkasi (dated 10.03.2026), witness D.W.2 (Azhagammal) was recalled and permitted to undergo cross-examination by the plaintiff's counsel. The court noted that defendants 14-17 did not conduct any cross-examination of this witness. The case involves a property dispute, and the order documents the witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  24. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 14-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  26. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  27. 04-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  28. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  29. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  30. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  31. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  32. 14-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  33. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  34. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  35. 23-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  36. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  37. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  38. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  39. 26-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  40. 27-Mar-2025

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  41. 20-Feb-2025

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  42. 05-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  43. 11-Dec-2024

    Publication

    Principal District Judge

  44. 06-Nov-2024

    Publication

    Principal District Judge

  45. 19-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  46. 04-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  47. 20-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  48. 02-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  49. 20-Jun-2024

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  50. 30-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 30-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In OS.No. 112/2024 at the Principal District Court, Tenkasi (dated 10.03.2026), witness D.W.2 (Azhagammal) was recalled and permitted to undergo cross-examination by the plaintiff's counsel. The court noted that defendants 14-17 did not conduct any cross-examination of this witness. The case involves a property dispute, and the order documents the witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case