Arputham and eight others vs Nasimudeen and two others Advocate - Exparte — 166/2020

Case under Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 Section IIR(1),(2). Status: Batta. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Batta Next hearing 22-Jul-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTS010003612020

Filing Number

263/2020

Filing Date

29-Jun-2020

Registration No

166/2020

Registration Date

07-Jul-2020

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

2-Additional District Session Judge

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 Section IIR(1),(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arputham and eight others

    Adv. Tr.K.Eskkidurai

  2. 2.Antony

    Adv. Tr.K.Esakkidurai

  3. 3.Murugan

    Adv. Tr.K.Esakkidurai

  4. 4.Iyyammal

    Adv. Tr.K.Esakkidurai

  5. 5.Santhi

    Adv. Tr.K.Esakkidurai

  6. 6.Kaniyappa

    Adv. Tr.K.Esakkidurai

  7. 7.Ganesan

    Adv. Tr.K.Esakkidurai

  8. 8.Backyalakshmi

    Adv. Tr.K.Esakkidurai

  9. 9.Sudalaimuthu

    Adv. Tr.K.Esakkidurai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nasimudeen and two others Advocate - Exparte

  2. 2.Hamsa Ameer

    Adv. Exparte

  3. 3.SBI General Insurance Company Limited, Chennai

    Adv. j.s

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Batta

    Additional District Session Judge

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Batta

    Additional District Session Judge

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

    Additional District Session Judge

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

    Additional District Session Judge

  6. 08-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Additional District Session Judge

  7. 13-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  8. 09-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  9. 09-Apr-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  10. 19-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  11. 08-Jan-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: In MCOP 166/2020 before the Additional District Judge, Tenkasi (heard 08.01.2025), witness Murugan was recalled and examined with cross-examination permitted. The 3rd respondent, during cross-examination, contested claims that he was responsible for a fatal accident involving the petitioner's elderly father, arguing the death resulted from old age rather than accident injuries. The court found the respondent's arguments regarding lack of causal connection between injuries and death, medical treatment predating the accident, and disputed documentary evidence insufficient to establish motor vehicle compensation liability. Order: Cross-examination of the 3rd respondent concluded; no further examination permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 08-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  13. 27-Nov-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  14. 21-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  15. 24-Jul-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  16. 19-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  17. 10-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  18. 28-Feb-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  19. 24-Jan-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  20. 13-Dec-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  21. 22-Nov-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  22. 18-Oct-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  23. 20-Sep-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  24. 19-Aug-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  25. 31-Jul-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  26. 18-Jul-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  27. 18-Jul-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  28. 27-Jun-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Session Judge

  29. 27-Apr-2023

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  30. 19-Apr-2023

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  31. 01-Mar-2023

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  32. 08-Feb-2023

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  33. 21-Dec-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  34. 12-Nov-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  35. 12-Oct-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  36. 13-Aug-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  37. 20-Jul-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  38. 27-Apr-2022

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  39. 12-Mar-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  40. 23-Feb-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  41. 11-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  42. 08-Dec-2021

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  43. 26-Oct-2021

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  44. 07-Sep-2021

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  45. 10-Jul-2021

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  46. 05-Jul-2021

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Session Judge

  47. 23-Jun-2021

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  48. 24-Mar-2021

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  49. 17-Feb-2021

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  50. 02-Dec-2020

    Counter

    Additional District Session Judge

  51. 23-Sep-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 29-Jun-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 166/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In MCOP 166/2020 before the Additional District Judge, Tenkasi (heard 08.01.2025), witness Murugan was recalled and examined with cross-examination permitted. The 3rd respondent, during cross-examination, contested claims that he was responsible for a fatal accident involving the petitioner's elderly father, arguing the death resulted from old age rather than accident injuries. The court found the respondent's arguments regarding lack of causal connection between injuries and death, medical treatment predating the accident, and disputed documentary evidence insufficient to establish motor vehicle compensation liability. Order: Cross-examination of the 3rd respondent concluded; no further examination permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case