Lakaram Constructions and Interior through properitorMaridurai vs Elango Satheesh Advocate - Tr.S.Sivakumar — 77/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7, R1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS010003412024
Filing Number
68/2024
Filing Date
20-Mar-2024
Registration No
77/2024
Registration Date
20-Mar-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lakaram Constructions and Interior through properitorMaridurai
Adv. R.Saravanan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Elango Satheesh Advocate - Tr.S.Sivakumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
21-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
The Principal District Court, Tenkasi, in OS No. 77/2024 (dated 03.03.2026), allowed the defendant's cross-examination and partially ruled in the defendant's favor regarding a construction contract dispute. The court found the defendant liable to pay only ₹10,30,000 to the plaintiff instead of the full claimed amount, noting discrepancies in materials used and incomplete fulfillment of contractual obligations regarding water tank fixtures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
19-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
29-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
13-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
23-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
20-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2024
The Principal District Court, Tenkasi, in OS No. 77/2024 (dated 03.03.2026), allowed the defendant's cross-examination and partially ruled in the defendant's favor regarding a construction contract dispute. The court found the defendant liable to pay only ₹10,30,000 to the plaintiff instead of the full claimed amount, noting discrepancies in materials used and incomplete fulfillment of contractual obligations regarding water tank fixtures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts