Suresh vs State Government the Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi — 99/2026

Case under Sc / St (prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 4(2)Provisio. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 21st April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010000532026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-12-2025

Filing Number

37/2026

Filing Date

03-01-2026

Registration No

99/2026

Registration Date

12-01-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

SC / ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 4(2)Provisio

Petitioner(s)

Suresh

Adv. C Sureshkumar

Respondent(s)

State Government the Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

21-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Appearance

26-03-2026

Appearance

17-03-2026

Appearance

10-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

21-04-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition as not maintainable, holding that the petitioner failed to establish "wilful neglect" under Section 4(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, which requires clear material indicating intentional or deliberate neglect supported by prior administrative findings. The court found the petition procedurally defective for impleading high-ranking officials without specific allegations, failing to exhaust statutory remedies, and seeking relief beyond the court's jurisdiction; however, it permitted the petitioner to approach the Special Court under Section 200 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition as not maintainable, holding that the petitioner failed to establish "wilful neglect" under Section 4(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, which requires clear material indicating intentional or deliberate neglect supported by prior administrative findings. The court found the petition procedurally defective for impleading high-ranking officials without specific allegations, failing to exhaust statutory remedies, and seeking relief beyond the court's jurisdiction; however, it permitted the petitioner to approach the Special Court under Section 200 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case