R.N.Ramanathan vs J.Amul Advocate - T.Kumar — 84/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7 R 1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR380005602022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
560/2022
Filing Date
08-07-2019
Registration No
84/2022
Registration Date
08-07-2019
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvottiyur
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.N.Ramanathan
Adv. G.Baburao
Respondent(s)
J.Amul Advocate - T.Kumar
J.Vicknesh
Adv. T.Kumar
Sankar @ Vincent
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Issues |
| 06-02-2026 | Issues |
| 19-12-2025 | Issues |
| 17-11-2025 | Issues |
| 15-10-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The suit filed by R.N. Ramanathan for recovery of Rs. 4,98,000 against three defendants has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court found that defendants J. Amul and J. Vicknesh borrowed Rs. 3,00,000 from the plaintiff on 10.07.2016 via an unregistered simple mortgage deed, agreeing to repay with 24% per annum interest, but failed to repay despite legal notice. Since the defendants remained ex parte and provided no defense, the court ordered them to jointly and severally pay Rs. 4,98,000 with 6% per annum interest on the principal amount from the date of the plaint until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The suit filed by R.N. Ramanathan for recovery of Rs. 4,98,000 against three defendants has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court found that defendants J. Amul and J. Vicknesh borrowed Rs. 3,00,000 from the plaintiff on 10.07.2016 via an unregistered simple mortgage deed, agreeing to repay with 24% per annum interest, but failed to repay despite legal notice. Since the defendants remained ex parte and provided no defense, the court ordered them to jointly and severally pay Rs. 4,98,000 with 6% per annum interest on the principal amount from the date of the plaint until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts