R.N.Ramanathan vs J.Amul Advocate - T.Kumar — 84/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7 R 1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR380005602022
Filing Number
560/2022
Filing Date
08-Jul-2019
Registration No
84/2022
Registration Date
08-Jul-2019
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvottiyur
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R.N.Ramanathan
Adv. G.Baburao
Respondent(s)
-
1.J.Amul Advocate - T.Kumar
-
2.J.Vicknesh
Adv. T.Kumar
-
3.Sankar @ Vincent
Case History
-
15-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Jul-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Restored
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Mar-2023
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
SUMMARY The suit filed by R.N. Ramanathan for recovery of Rs. 4,98,000 against three defendants has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court found that defendants J. Amul and J. Vicknesh borrowed Rs. 3,00,000 from the plaintiff on 10.07.2016 via an unregistered simple mortgage deed, agreeing to repay with 24% per annum interest, but failed to repay despite legal notice. Since the defendants remained ex parte and provided no defense, the court ordered them to jointly and severally pay Rs. 4,98,000 with 6% per annum interest on the principal amount from the date of the plaint until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Mar-2023
Disposed
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Feb-2023
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Feb-2023
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Jan-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Dec-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Nov-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Nov-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Oct-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Sep-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Sep-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jul-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 84/2022
SUMMARY The suit filed by R.N. Ramanathan for recovery of Rs. 4,98,000 against three defendants has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court found that defendants J. Amul and J. Vicknesh borrowed Rs. 3,00,000 from the plaintiff on 10.07.2016 via an unregistered simple mortgage deed, agreeing to repay with 24% per annum interest, but failed to repay despite legal notice. Since the defendants remained ex parte and provided no defense, the court ordered them to jointly and severally pay Rs. 4,98,000 with 6% per annum interest on the principal amount from the date of the plaint until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts