M1 Inspector of police vs Vijay (a) Puppy Vijay — 260/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),115(2),308(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 26th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR370006292026
Filing Number
580/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
260/2026
Registration Date
21-May-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Madhavaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Madhavaram
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
375
Police Station
M1 Madhavaram Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M1 Inspector of police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijay (a) Puppy Vijay
-
2.Jayavanan (a) Gnanam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Madhavaram granted bail to accused Vijay (a) Puppy Vijay and Jayavanan (a) Gnanam in Criminal Case No. 375/2026, considering their 6-day judicial custody, investigation stage, and nature of offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 308(2), and 351(3). The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police station reporting for 30 days, non-absconding undertaking, and prohibition against tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Madhavaram
-
25-May-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Madhavaram
-
21-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 260/2026
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Madhavaram granted bail to accused Vijay (a) Puppy Vijay and Jayavanan (a) Gnanam in Criminal Case No. 375/2026, considering their 6-day judicial custody, investigation stage, and nature of offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 308(2), and 351(3). The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police station reporting for 30 days, non-absconding undertaking, and prohibition against tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts