M3 Puzhal Inspector of police vs Bhargath — 259/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),329(4),115(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 26th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR370006282026
Filing Number
579/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
259/2026
Registration Date
21-May-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Madhavaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Madhavaram
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
410
Police Station
M3 Puzhal Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M3 Puzhal Inspector of police
Adv. ARUNKUMAR V
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhargath
-
2.Deepan
-
3.Vignesh
-
4.Vallarasu
-
5.Vignesh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Madhavaram granted bail to five accused persons (Bhargath, Deepan, Vignesh, Vallarasu, and Vignesh) arrested for offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 329(4), 115(2), 351(3) BNS read with section 4 of TNPHW Act, after considering the stage of investigation, nature of offence, and their 6-day custody period. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police station reporting for 30 days, and prohibitions against absconding, committing similar offences, and tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Madhavaram
-
25-May-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Madhavaram
-
21-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 259/2026
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Madhavaram granted bail to five accused persons (Bhargath, Deepan, Vignesh, Vallarasu, and Vignesh) arrested for offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 329(4), 115(2), 351(3) BNS read with section 4 of TNPHW Act, after considering the stage of investigation, nature of offence, and their 6-day custody period. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police station reporting for 30 days, and prohibitions against absconding, committing similar offences, and tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts