The Sub Inspector of Police, Kavarapettai PS vs Alex A — 315/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTR360026702025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-08-2025

Filing Number

2566/2025

Filing Date

29-08-2025

Registration No

315/2025

Registration Date

06-10-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

The Sub Inspector of Police, Kavarapettai PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Alex A

Sarathi Alias appu A2

Priyan Alias jeba A3

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

11-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Judgement

04-03-2026

Questioning

02-03-2026

Evidence

13-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The District Criminal Court acquitted three accused persons of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation with death threat), finding reasonable doubt about whether the alleged assault and threats actually occurred. The court determined that prosecution witnesses, including the complainant and victim, provided inconsistent statements, the investigating officer's testimony lacked credibility regarding evidence collection procedures, and the material facts of the incident remained unproven beyond reasonable doubt. Applying the principle that doubt benefits the accused, the court discharged the defendants and ordered destruction of seized articles after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Criminal Court acquitted three accused persons of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation with death threat), finding reasonable doubt about whether the alleged assault and threats actually occurred. The court determined that prosecution witnesses, including the complainant and victim, provided inconsistent statements, the investigating officer's testimony lacked credibility regarding evidence collection procedures, and the material facts of the incident remained unproven beyond reasonable doubt. Applying the principle that doubt benefits the accused, the court discharged the defendants and ordered destruction of seized articles after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case