INS. of police RPF Gummidipoondi P.S Cr.No. 9/2020 (split Up From CC 147/ vs Selvaraj — 55/2023
Case under Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 Section 3(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR360007002023
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
55/2023
Filing Date
02-02-2021
Registration No
55/2023
Registration Date
02-02-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INS. of police RPF Gummidipoondi P.S Cr.No. 9/2020 (split Up From CC 147/
Respondent(s)
Selvaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 17-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The District Civil and Criminal Court at Kumudipoondi (Case No. C.C. 55/2023) heard cross-examination of the prosecution witness (ASI Ramalingam) on 14.11.2025 regarding an RPF theft case. The court recorded multiple deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence, including missing details on stolen goods value, absence of railway markings on seized items, lack of proper documentation, and witness credibility issues. The case appears to be in the examination stage with the court noting evidentiary gaps in the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Civil and Criminal Court at Kumudipoondi (Case No. C.C. 55/2023) heard cross-examination of the prosecution witness (ASI Ramalingam) on 14.11.2025 regarding an RPF theft case. The court recorded multiple deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence, including missing details on stolen goods value, absence of railway markings on seized items, lack of proper documentation, and witness credibility issues. The case appears to be in the examination stage with the court noting evidentiary gaps in the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts