INS. of Police RPS Gummidipoondi Cr.No 8.2020 (Split Up from 149/ vs Selvaraj — 54/2023
Case under Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 Section 3(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR360006992023
Filing Number
54/2023
Filing Date
02-Feb-2021
Registration No
54/2023
Registration Date
02-Feb-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INS. of Police RPS Gummidipoondi Cr.No 8.2020 (Split Up from 149/
Respondent(s)
-
1.Selvaraj
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
14-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
The court examined the testimony of witness ASA.1 (a Senior Section Engineer) under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, and found significant deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence regarding an alleged railway theft case (C.C. 54/2023). The cross-examination revealed multiple gaps in the police investigation, including missing details about stolen goods' value, railway markings, weight specifications, and incomplete documentation of seized items. The case appears to be still pending with the court noting evidentiary weaknesses that undermine the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
01-Aug-2025
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
25-Jul-2025
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
04-Jul-2025
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
16-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
28-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
27-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
23-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
03-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
19-Jul-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
14-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
15-Apr-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
08-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
12-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
17-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
20-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
19-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
18-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
11-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2023
The court examined the testimony of witness ASA.1 (a Senior Section Engineer) under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, and found significant deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence regarding an alleged railway theft case (C.C. 54/2023). The cross-examination revealed multiple gaps in the police investigation, including missing details about stolen goods' value, railway markings, weight specifications, and incomplete documentation of seized items. The case appears to be still pending with the court noting evidentiary weaknesses that undermine the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts