Hemanth vs The Inspector of Police, Pathirivedu P.S Advocate - APP — 303/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 01st June 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR360006552026
Filing Number
631/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
303/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
99
Police Station
Padirivedu. P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hemanth
Adv. Vijayaraman
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police, Pathirivedu P.S Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: Case 303/2026 - Hemanth v. Inspector of Police, Pathirivedu P.S The court granted bail to Hemanth (petitioner), who was arrested under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(1), 118(1), and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting and threatening a complainant on May 19, 2026. The court found that Hemanth had been in judicial custody for 12 days with no prior criminal record and determined bail was appropriate in the interests of justice, subject to conditions including a ₹10,000 surety bond and regular police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
29-May-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
26-May-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
-
22-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 303/2026
Summary: Case 303/2026 - Hemanth v. Inspector of Police, Pathirivedu P.S The court granted bail to Hemanth (petitioner), who was arrested under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(1), 118(1), and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting and threatening a complainant on May 19, 2026. The court found that Hemanth had been in judicial custody for 12 days with no prior criminal record and determined bail was appropriate in the interests of justice, subject to conditions including a ₹10,000 surety bond and regular police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts