Ramu vs The Inspector of Police, Pathirived P.S Advocate - APP — 105/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR360002502026

Filing Number

241/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

105/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramu

    Adv. T. Magendiran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police, Pathirived P.S Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi allowed the petitioner's petition and ordered return of stolen gold jewelry and silver ornaments seized by police to the petitioner as interim custody. The court, relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, held that valuable articles should not remain in police custody for years during investigation, and the owner would suffer if not returned. The petitioner must execute a ₹50,000 bond with two sureties, not alter the property, provide photographs, and produce it in court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 105/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi allowed the petitioner's petition and ordered return of stolen gold jewelry and silver ornaments seized by police to the petitioner as interim custody. The court, relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, held that valuable articles should not remain in police custody for years during investigation, and the owner would suffer if not returned. The petitioner must execute a ₹50,000 bond with two sureties, not alter the property, provide photographs, and produce it in court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case