Sriman Narayanan vs The Inspector of Police, Pathirivedu P.S Advocate - APP — 103/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR360002482026
Filing Number
239/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
103/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sriman Narayanan
Adv. R. Velu
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police, Pathirivedu P.S Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 26-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 24-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Gummidipoondi allowed the petitioner's petition for interim custody of a seized Vento car (Reg. No. TN 05 BL 1770), finding that the petitioner proved ownership and that retaining valuable property in police custody longer than necessary causes unjust hardship. The court granted interim custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, prohibition on altering the vehicle, and production before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Gummidipoondi allowed the petitioner's petition for interim custody of a seized Vento car (Reg. No. TN 05 BL 1770), finding that the petitioner proved ownership and that retaining valuable property in police custody longer than necessary causes unjust hardship. The court granted interim custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, prohibition on altering the vehicle, and production before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts