Sriman Narayanan vs The Inspector of Police, Pathirivedu P.S Advocate - APP — 103/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR360002482026

Filing Number

239/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sriman Narayanan

    Adv. R. Velu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police, Pathirivedu P.S Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Gummidipoondi allowed the petitioner's petition for interim custody of a seized Vento car (Reg. No. TN 05 BL 1770), finding that the petitioner proved ownership and that retaining valuable property in police custody longer than necessary causes unjust hardship. The court granted interim custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, prohibition on altering the vehicle, and production before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Gummidipoondi allowed the petitioner's petition for interim custody of a seized Vento car (Reg. No. TN 05 BL 1770), finding that the petitioner proved ownership and that retaining valuable property in police custody longer than necessary causes unjust hardship. The court granted interim custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, prohibition on altering the vehicle, and production before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case