Munusamy vs The Inspector of Police, Arambakkam P.S Advocate - APP — 101/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR360002452026
Filing Number
236/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
101/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Munusamy
Adv. M. Jadarayan
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police, Arambakkam P.S Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Gummidipoondi
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 03-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Gummidipoondi granted the petitioner's plea for interim custody of his tractor-trailer (Registration No. AP 39 UX 2450) seized in an illegal sand theft case (Cr.No.201/2025). The court held that retaining property unnecessarily causes irreparable loss to the owner and ordered return of the vehicle subject to stringent conditions including a ₹2,00,000 bond, insurance, photographic documentation, and non-alteration undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Gummidipoondi granted the petitioner's plea for interim custody of his tractor-trailer (Registration No. AP 39 UX 2450) seized in an illegal sand theft case (Cr.No.201/2025). The court held that retaining property unnecessarily causes irreparable loss to the owner and ordered return of the vehicle subject to stringent conditions including a ₹2,00,000 bond, insurance, photographic documentation, and non-alteration undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts