A.JAYALAKSHMI vs N.NAGARAJAN — 81/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,200,357. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

Questioning Next hearing 26-Mar-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTR350026652023

e-Filing Number

29-09-2023

Filing Number

2665/2023

Filing Date

29-Sep-2023

Registration No

81/2024

Registration Date

16-Apr-2024

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,200,357

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.JAYALAKSHMI

    Adv. C. Sridhar

  2. 2.A.JAYALAKSHMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N.NAGARAJAN

Case History

  1. 26-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition record (PW1) in a criminal case (STC.No.81/2024) before the Fast Track Court in Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, dated 06.03.2026. The witness (a 42-year-old makeup artist named Peyalakshmi) testified regarding an allegation involving the defendant's request for her Aadhar card, PAN card, and passport-size photo, which she claims were used to file a fraudulent case against her. The witness maintains she obtained these documents from the defendant for legitimate financial/lending purposes and denies the accusation that she misused them to file this case against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  15. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  16. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  17. 04-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  19. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  20. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  21. 05-Mar-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  22. 31-Jan-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  23. 26-Dec-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  24. 18-Nov-2024

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  25. 24-Oct-2024

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  26. 23-Oct-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  27. 05-Aug-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  28. 19-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

  29. 16-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 29-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition record (PW1) in a criminal case (STC.No.81/2024) before the Fast Track Court in Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, dated 06.03.2026. The witness (a 42-year-old makeup artist named Peyalakshmi) testified regarding an allegation involving the defendant's request for her Aadhar card, PAN card, and passport-size photo, which she claims were used to file a fraudulent case against her. The witness maintains she obtained these documents from the defendant for legitimate financial/lending purposes and denies the accusation that she misused them to file this case against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case