A.JAYALAKSHMI vs N.NAGARAJAN — 81/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,200,357. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTR350026652023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
e-Filing Number
29-09-2023
Filing Number
2665/2023
Filing Date
29-09-2023
Registration No
81/2024
Registration Date
16-04-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.JAYALAKSHMI
Adv. C. Sridhar
A.JAYALAKSHMI
Respondent(s)
N.NAGARAJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (PW1) in a criminal case (STC.No.81/2024) before the Fast Track Court in Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, dated 06.03.2026. The witness (a 42-year-old makeup artist named Peyalakshmi) testified regarding an allegation involving the defendant's request for her Aadhar card, PAN card, and passport-size photo, which she claims were used to file a fraudulent case against her. The witness maintains she obtained these documents from the defendant for legitimate financial/lending purposes and denies the accusation that she misused them to file this case against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (PW1) in a criminal case (STC.No.81/2024) before the Fast Track Court in Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, dated 06.03.2026. The witness (a 42-year-old makeup artist named Peyalakshmi) testified regarding an allegation involving the defendant's request for her Aadhar card, PAN card, and passport-size photo, which she claims were used to file a fraudulent case against her. The witness maintains she obtained these documents from the defendant for legitimate financial/lending purposes and denies the accusation that she misused them to file this case against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts