K.Satheesh kumar.,Sree gokulam chits vs C.Sekar — 179/2021

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTR350017192021

Judgement

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

1719/2021

Filing Date

05-04-2021

Registration No

179/2021

Registration Date

19-07-2021

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Mp/7/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section C.SekarK.Satheesh kumar.,Sree gokulam chits
Mp/8/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section C.SekarK.Satheesh kumar.,Sree gokulam chits
Mp/9/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section C.SekarK.Satheesh kumar.,Sree gokulam chits
Mp/10/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section C.SekarK.Satheesh kumar.,Sree gokulam chits

Petitioner(s)

K.Satheesh kumar.,Sree gokulam chits

Adv. S.Sundar

Respondent(s)

C.Sekar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

17-03-2026

Judgement

06-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

03-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

04-04-2025
Copy of Deposition

Case No. S.D.C. 179/2021 | Date: 04.04.2025 | Fast Track Court, Ambattur The court rejected the defendant's cross-examination arguments and found his defenses regarding missing documents, lack of proper approval, and procedural delays to be without merit. The court determined that the defendant failed to prove he was not liable for the debt and that the cheque mentioned in the complaint was properly deposited with the bank on 18.01.2021, dismissing his contentions about delays and document requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case No. S.D.C. 179/2021 | Date: 04.04.2025 | Fast Track Court, Ambattur The court rejected the defendant's cross-examination arguments and found his defenses regarding missing documents, lack of proper approval, and procedural delays to be without merit. The court determined that the defendant failed to prove he was not liable for the debt and that the cheque mentioned in the complaint was properly deposited with the bank on 18.01.2021, dismissing his contentions about delays and document requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case