K.Satheeh kumar vs P.B.Sundari — 199/2021

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTR350017062021

Judgement

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

1706/2021

Filing Date

01-04-2021

Registration No

199/2021

Registration Date

07-08-2021

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Mp/7/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section P.B.SundariK.Satheeh kumar
Mp/8/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section P.B.SundariK.Satheeh kumar
Mp/9/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section P.B.SundariK.Satheeh kumar
Mp/10/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section P.B.SundariK.Satheeh kumar
Mp/11/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section P.B.SundariK.Satheeh kumar

Petitioner(s)

K.Satheeh kumar

Adv. S.Sundar

Respondent(s)

P.B.Sundari

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

17-03-2026

Judgement

06-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

03-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

04-04-2025
Copy of Deposition

Summary: In this case (S.D.C. No. 199/2021) dated April 4, 2025, the Fast Track Court at Ambattur rejected the defendant's arguments regarding missing documentation, delivery of cheques, and the validity of the transaction. The court found that the defendant failed to substantiate claims that a cheque was not delivered to the company on January 18, 2021, and that subsequent banking procedures were irregular. The petition was dismissed, with the court ruling against the defendant's contentions and upholding the plaintiff's case regarding the debt obligation and contractual validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this case (S.D.C. No. 199/2021) dated April 4, 2025, the Fast Track Court at Ambattur rejected the defendant's arguments regarding missing documentation, delivery of cheques, and the validity of the transaction. The court found that the defendant failed to substantiate claims that a cheque was not delivered to the company on January 18, 2021, and that subsequent banking procedures were irregular. The petition was dismissed, with the court ruling against the defendant's contentions and upholding the plaintiff's case regarding the debt obligation and contractual validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case