K.Satheesh kumar vs P.B.Sundari — 194/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTR350017022021
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
1702/2021
Filing Date
01-04-2021
Registration No
194/2021
Registration Date
07-08-2021
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Satheesh kumar
Adv. S.Sundar
Respondent(s)
P.B.Sundari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Judgement
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This Fast Track Court judgment (Case No. S.D.C. 194/2021, dated 04.04.2025) dismisses the cross-examination petition filed by defendant Sathishkumar. The court rejected the defendant's arguments regarding lack of proper authorization documents, incorporation certificates, board resolutions, and claims about non-receipt of cheques, finding them to be without merit. The court upheld that the cheque was deposited on 18.01.2021 and the case should proceed, rejecting the defendant's contentions that documentation was insufficient or procedures were violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This Fast Track Court judgment (Case No. S.D.C. 194/2021, dated 04.04.2025) dismisses the cross-examination petition filed by defendant Sathishkumar. The court rejected the defendant's arguments regarding lack of proper authorization documents, incorporation certificates, board resolutions, and claims about non-receipt of cheques, finding them to be without merit. The court upheld that the cheque was deposited on 18.01.2021 and the case should proceed, rejecting the defendant's contentions that documentation was insufficient or procedures were violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts