M/s. Vignesh and Co. Rep. by its Partner Mr. J. Babu and others vs Merck Automobile Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director Mr. V. Sudhakaran — 187/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTR350009712020
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
970/2020
Filing Date
23-09-2020
Registration No
187/2020
Registration Date
09-12-2020
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s. Vignesh and Co. Rep. by its Partner Mr. J. Babu and others
Adv. Gnanadesikan
Respondent(s)
Merck Automobile Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director Mr. V. Sudhakaran
V. Sudhakaran, Managing Director, M/s. Merck Automobile Pvt.Ltd.
Aishwarya Jayanthi, Director M/s. Merck Automobile Pvt. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
CMP Pending
CMP Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | CMP Pending |
| 09-12-2025 | CMP Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: This document is a witness deposition (PW1) in case STC.No.187/2020 before the Fast Track Court in Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, dated 22.10.2025. The witness testifies regarding a commercial dispute involving four vehicles/goods, correspondence with the opposing party about payment into bank, and claims that no goods remain in the showroom. The witness denies cross-examination, and the court records the deposition under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This document is a witness deposition (PW1) in case STC.No.187/2020 before the Fast Track Court in Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, dated 22.10.2025. The witness testifies regarding a commercial dispute involving four vehicles/goods, correspondence with the opposing party about payment into bank, and claims that no goods remain in the showroom. The witness denies cross-examination, and the court records the deposition under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts