S.Parthiban vs B. Manikandan — 135/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR350003032017
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
135/2017
Filing Date
03-04-2017
Registration No
135/2017
Registration Date
03-04-2017
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.Parthiban
Adv. R. Pandiyan and others
Respondent(s)
B. Manikandan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 28-01-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 02-12-2025 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 15-10-2025 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 04-08-2025 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case No. RP/135/2017 | Date: 07.12.2021 | Fast Track Court, Ambattur The court dismissed the petition filed by Mr. S. Parthiban against Sri Ramulu due to insufficient evidence and lack of proper documentation regarding the alleged loan transaction. The court found critical deficiencies including missing loan agreement dates, absence of credible witnesses, and discrepancies in the parties' identities and ages in the supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case No. RP/135/2017 | Date: 07.12.2021 | Fast Track Court, Ambattur The court dismissed the petition filed by Mr. S. Parthiban against Sri Ramulu due to insufficient evidence and lack of proper documentation regarding the alleged loan transaction. The court found critical deficiencies including missing loan agreement dates, absence of credible witnesses, and discrepancies in the parties' identities and ages in the supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts