M/s KUSUM SYNDICATE Proprietor P SAJJAN RAJ vs JAYALAKSHMI EQUIPMENTS Rep by K JAYARAMAN — 53/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTR350002372025
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
09-12-2024
Filing Number
236/2025
Filing Date
20-02-2025
Registration No
53/2025
Registration Date
01-03-2025
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Ambattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s KUSUM SYNDICATE Proprietor P SAJJAN RAJ
Adv. D Inbaraj
Respondent(s)
JAYALAKSHMI EQUIPMENTS Rep by K JAYARAMAN
Jayalakshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Evidence
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW1) in case STC.No.53/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, recorded on 06.03.2026. PW1, owner of Kusum Syndicate, testified regarding a loan dispute, stating that Rs. 13,00,000 was advanced to the accused on 01.04.2019, with Rs. 2,00,000 in cash and the balance via cheques, and that the accused repaid the entire amount and provided cheques as security. No cross-examination was conducted by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW1) in case STC.No.53/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, recorded on 06.03.2026. PW1, owner of Kusum Syndicate, testified regarding a loan dispute, stating that Rs. 13,00,000 was advanced to the accused on 01.04.2019, with Rs. 2,00,000 in cash and the balance via cheques, and that the accused repaid the entire amount and provided cheques as security. No cross-examination was conducted by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts